on February 15, 2012 at 7:06 pm
Ahhh, the days when chokers were chokers.
Monica Murphy says:
on February 16, 2012 at 12:51 pm
yow
Monica M. says:
on February 16, 2012 at 12:54 pm
i think hat girl has some place else to be.
Cherry O'Pepsi says:
on February 16, 2012 at 1:28 pm
I love the hat.. but that Lewinsky chick kinda ruined berets for the masses. booo.
Indie_Rock_Girl says:
on February 19, 2012 at 8:40 pm
Are they twins?
Michael in YYZ says:
on February 21, 2012 at 6:01 pm
This photo should under ‘Atwood types’ in the dictionary.
Lulu Bourbon says:
on March 23, 2012 at 9:39 am
Twins, definitely…
Jad says:
on June 10, 2012 at 8:01 am
I would definitely say sisters, but not twins.
Chrome Toaster says:
on July 14, 2014 at 6:32 pm
I don’t think Polaroids should be cropped. If it’s a Polaroid, please retain the integrity of the classic white border! (Found MUST agree, or why would there be an entire book devoted to Found Polaroids?)
on February 15, 2012 at 7:06 pm
Ahhh, the days when chokers were chokers.
on February 16, 2012 at 12:51 pm
yow
on February 16, 2012 at 12:54 pm
i think hat girl has some place else to be.
on February 16, 2012 at 1:28 pm
I love the hat.. but that Lewinsky chick kinda ruined berets for the masses. booo.
on February 19, 2012 at 8:40 pm
Are they twins?
on February 21, 2012 at 6:01 pm
This photo should under ‘Atwood types’ in the dictionary.
on March 23, 2012 at 9:39 am
Twins, definitely…
on June 10, 2012 at 8:01 am
I would definitely say sisters, but not twins.
on July 14, 2014 at 6:32 pm
I don’t think Polaroids should be cropped. If it’s a Polaroid, please retain the integrity of the classic white border! (Found MUST agree, or why would there be an entire book devoted to Found Polaroids?)